<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Back Seat Marketers &#187; Quantcast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://backseatmarketers.com/category/quantcast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://backseatmarketers.com</link>
	<description>Offering Lots of Marketing Directions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 14:34:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Quantcast: Site Profiles via Panels v. Google + DoubleClick</title>
		<link>http://backseatmarketers.com/2008/03/23/quantcast-site-profiles-via-panels-v-google-doubleclick/</link>
		<comments>http://backseatmarketers.com/2008/03/23/quantcast-site-profiles-via-panels-v-google-doubleclick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 20:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cory</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DoubleClick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quantcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Too Early]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backseatmarketers.com/2008/03/23/quantcast-site-profiles-via-panels-v-google-doubleclick/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Compete, Alexa, Hitwise and comScore all have ways to determine website traffic statistics. All have differences that are widely disputed and for good reason. First, as a web colleague will tell me (much to my dismay), &#8220;you can&#8217;t measure web site page hits because they don&#8217;t really work that way.&#8221; Here&#8217;s a few reasons why:
1. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.compete.com/" target="_blank">Compete</a>, <a href="http://www.alexa.com/" target="_blank">Alexa</a>, Hitwise and <a href="http://www.comscore.com/" target="_blank">comScore</a> all have ways to determine website traffic statistics. All have differences that are widely disputed and for good reason. First, as a web colleague will tell me (much to my dismay), &#8220;you can&#8217;t measure web site page hits because they don&#8217;t really work that way.&#8221; Here&#8217;s a few reasons why:<br />
1.  Web server page delivery &#8211; Put simply, since a web server delivers web pages in an imperfect world, the measurement of what a hit is can be very hard to nail down.<br />
2. AJAX &#8211; The introduction of AJAX has muddied the waters even more given a page delivered can be a long-tenured visit with many interactions that are harder to trace accurately.<br />
3. Lengthening page views &#8211; Video creates a final issue for web statistics as the length on a page may now be 5 minutes or even 3x that. Time on a site may be just as important as clicks.</p>
<p>Given unique page hits prove to be less than accurate creates a motivation to shift to thinking about unique visitors. Since theoretically visitors are a higher order view on website traffic and easier to capture at the session level, we can get at least a better picture of the quality of traffic.</p>
<p><strong>Quantcast</strong><br />
In searching <a href="http://www.patentmonkey.com/" target="_blank">an old project</a>, I noticed quantcast has popped up onto the top search page with an interesting set of results.<br />
<img src="http://backseatmarketers.com/wordpress-BSM/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/quantcast.jpg" alt="Quantcast" /></p>
<p>What I like is the idea that an openly structured freemium site is going to push demographic information about users with a nice interface. What is concerning is the same old sample/projection problem that exists for all other services. Compete does a good job of getting into the browser for users (the more it is installed on browsers, the closer to an accurate portrait of the web it can report since this isn&#8217;t statistical sampling).  That said, comScore&#8217;s methods probably get to a better, more accurate overall picture: aggregating ISP traffic for a macro view combined with a panel.</p>
<p><strong>Traditional Scale + Sample = Projection v.<br />
Long Tail + Interactive = Market of 1</strong><br />
While I think Quantcast could be an interesting option for traditional marketers where big advertisers can find big sites with hefty traffic to support the demographic boxes with quantifiable answers, it is going to have the 800 lb gorilla to deal with in Google post DoubleClick. DoubleClick&#8217;s vision of individually targeted ads based on a user&#8217;s profile will be fulfilled when connected to Google&#8217;s amassing registered user traffic history.</p>
<p>I think it is Too Early to say game over, but looking a couple steps ahead to an even more fragmented web with ever lower traffic statistics per publisher, services like this are going to have to get ahead of the media consumer as a unique profile for targeted advertising/messaging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://backseatmarketers.com/2008/03/23/quantcast-site-profiles-via-panels-v-google-doubleclick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
