<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forward Looking: Drinking from the Fire Hose</title>
	<link>http://backseatmarketers.com/2008/04/07/forward-looking-drinking-from-the-fire-hose/</link>
	<description>Offering Lots of Directions</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Adpuma</title>
		<link>http://backseatmarketers.com/2008/04/07/forward-looking-drinking-from-the-fire-hose/#comment-64</link>
		<author>Adpuma</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 06:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://backseatmarketers.com/2008/04/07/forward-looking-drinking-from-the-fire-hose/#comment-64</guid>
					<description>Great image in the title.  So far, different media produce communities with different etiquette/dynamics, due to things like ease of cross-linking, comments structure, etc. There *is* surplus of information, but it comes in forms people can assess intuitively, for the lack of better word.  Just naming your contacts "friends" on LiveJournal and "followers" on Twitter creates different expectations and weights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great image in the title.  So far, different media produce communities with different etiquette/dynamics, due to things like ease of cross-linking, comments structure, etc. There *is* surplus of information, but it comes in forms people can assess intuitively, for the lack of better word.  Just naming your contacts &#8220;friends&#8221; on LiveJournal and &#8220;followers&#8221; on Twitter creates different expectations and weights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
